Core Corporate Strategic Capabilities Role of Corporate Capabilities - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 12 Words: 3511 Downloads: 1 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Marketing Essay Type Research paper Did you like this example? Abstract Core strategies have been addressed in most of strategic literature but there has been little extension with respect to assessing the core strategic capabilities. Market measure which is done in form of looking competitive advantage has been the widely used measure for assessing the success of a strategy. Corporate reputation measure reflects into a large extent the performance measure, as well a society measure together with integrating institutional dimensions (macro, messo and micro). Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Core Corporate Strategic Capabilities: Role of Corporate Capabilities" essay for you Create order Capability of a strategy is not only assessed with respect to performance delivery but its ability to overcome environmental barriers, within and outside the corporate, and achieve these in integrity manner on which the outcome is sustainable corporate reputation which is measured from international as well as national eyes. In other words, reputable firms are well performing firms in the market (financial measure) but in addition they perform well in non financial measures. This paper has sited corporate capabilities as well as corporate integrity to be main ingredients toward core corporate strategic capabilities but also institutions shape both of them. On the other hand this paper is contributing to the standing literature with respect to assessing a capability of a strategy not only on the features and performance based but from society angle as well as in context of institutions. 1.0 Introduction Core corporate strategic capability is the question for many corporations that operates around many places in the world. Traditional measure for assessing the successful or a key strategy is with respect to their competitive advantage. Strategies in this scale are assessed to whether they fulfil the aspects of uniqueness, inimitable, rare, and be able to create value. The outcome of these dimensions leads into competitive advantage which by itself is a measure of firm competitiveness relative to another player in the firm. This measure is too limited for several reasons. Worden (2003: 39) commented that reputation is base of an organizational identity, crystallizing the essence of what a company is, does, and stands for through images held of the organization in its environment. This paper intends to go beyond in addressing the question of a capability of a strategy which is not only assessed within the constraints of performance though that is also one on the dimension. This pa per also has a view that a core strategic capability depend highly on the corporate capabilities (innovation, leadership/managerial, financial etc), but does as well include corporate integrity. Lenz (1980) defined strategic capability as the capability of an enterprise to successfully undertake action that is intended to affect its long-term growth and development. If Integrity has not being integrated into a strategy there will be a huge failure from within and from outside the firm. Core strategic capability not only relies on corporate capabilities but also relies on corporate integrity as well as on the influence of institutions. Tan Litschert (1994) found a different strategic focuses between planned economies and transition economies, implying a huge role of institutional factors in restructuring and assessing the strategic capabilities. 1.1 General Objective To analyze core corporate strategic capabilities and their ultimate influence on sustainable corporate reputation as well as assessing the role of corporate capability and corporate integrity on these strategic capabilities. 1.2 Specific objectives Defining and assess core corporate capabilities, core strategic capabilities, corporate reputation, institutions and corporate integrity. Analyze the influence of core corporate capabilities on core corporate strategic capabilities. Analyze the influence of Corporate Integrity on Core corporate strategic capabilities. Examine the role of institutions on both the ingredients influencing core corporate strategic capabilities and on sustainable corporate reputation. Analyze the influence of corporate core strategic capabilities on corporate sustainable reputation. 1.3 Reseach Questions What are core corporate capabilities? What are corporate core strategic capabilities? What is corporate reputation? What are institutions? What is corporate integrity? What is the influence of corporate core capabilities on corporate core strategic capabilities? What is the influence of corporate integrity on core strategic capabilities? What is the role of institutions on both ingredients that influence core strategic capabilities and on sustainable corporate reputation?; What is the influence of corporate core strategic capabilities on corporate sustainable reputation. 2.0 REVIEW OF LITERATURE AND CONCEPTS 2.1 Corporate capabilities Ulrich Wiersema (1989: 119) defined Organizational capability as a firms ability to establish internal structures and processes that create firm-specific competencies and enable it to adapt to changing external pressures. Day (1994), on the other hand distinguished between business/organizational assets from business/organizational capabilities. Wong (2009) argued that skills and competence of business continuity management are integral parts of strategic management. Irvin Michaels III (1989), noted skills to be critical capabilities that an organization as a whole has- as distinct from the capabilities of individuals in the organization. Other authors use the term capability to refer to certain key skills of the organization. Managerial, technological, leadership, innovation, negotiation and communication are some of capabilities that are mostly referred in most articles with respect to this subject (Lenz, 1980; Ulrich Lake, 1991). In this study corporate capabilities in addition to (Lenz, 1980, Ulrich Lake, 1991) should also be able to empower the organization through value creation, overcoming the corporate barriers as well as being relied for such purposes within the organization and ultimately they should be able to deliver the expectations of firm and society at large. 2.2 Corporate Integrity: Integrity is derived from Latin word integritas meaning wholeness, coherence, rightness, or purity, has both a narrow and broad sense (Worden, 2003:33), the author continued to argue that integrity can also be defined as consistency between word and deed, in line with a consistent set of principles or commitments, especially in the context of a temptation or challenge to the contrary. Schwartz (2005: 28) defined Integrity as to be of sound moral principle, to have the characteristics of honesty, sincerity, and condor. Koehn (2005) noted that integrity is a business asset and he claim we should value integrity because it has a market worth. To kohen, people of integrity want to act mindfully whenever, wherever and those possessing this virtue, act with both short and long-term. This paper views corporate integrity as not just abiding to laws or regulations of a particular country of fits into ethical views of a given culture but to constantly abiding to the global (internat ional) principles in terms of words and actions. 2.3 Corporate Reputation Worden (2003: 39) commented that reputation is base of an organizational identity, crystallizing the essence of what a company is, does, and stands for through images held of the organization in its environment. On the other hand Fombrun (1996), pointed out that Reputation capital is a form of intangible wealth which is closely associated with accounts call or goodwill and marketers term brand equity. Castro (2006) described corporate reputation as a result of the process of social legitimization. Reputation assumes an important role when there is uncertainty about the underlying quality of firms offerings (Robert and Dowlig, 2002: 1079). Describing the nature of uncertainty, authors argued that uncertainty makes it difficult for competing firms to quickly make quality demonstrations that would offset the signalling benefits associated with a good reputation. Schwaiger (2004) on the other hand pointed out that evaluating corporate reputation not only appraises subjective perc eptions of a companys attributes but also allows an intrinsic disposition towards these attributes. 2.4 Core strategic Capability Mintzberg (1973) defined strategy as a patterned stream of decisions, which focus on a set of resource allocations that are employed in an attempt to reach a position consistent with a firms environment. Ulrich Wiersema (1989) noted a need for firm to develop a sense of strategic capability so as to adjust with environmental turbulences. Lenz (1980) defined strategic capability as the capability of an enterprise to successfully undertake action that is intended to affect its long-term growth and development. Hafeez et al (2002) noted that key strategic capabilities are those that help to generate high profit margins, and are the clear market winners in securing market share however authors argued that relying purely on financial measures have implications. This paper perceive strategic capabilities to be able to link the corporate capabilities and their intended results as well as being able to overcome business and institutional barriers from within and outside the organ ization. 2.5 Institutions North (1990:34) defined institutions as humanly devised constraints that structure human interaction. Scott (1995:33) on the other hand defines institutions as regulatory, normative, and cognitive structures and activities that provide stability and meaning to social behaviour. Peng (2004) established what he noted as institutional framework and is made up of formal and informal institutions governing individual and firm behaviour and these institutions, in turn, are supported by three pillars, which are regulatory, normative and cognitive. Falkenberg (2007) viewed institutions as the those which provide traffic rules for carrying our transactions, or exchange. The major role of institutions in a society is to reduce uncertainty by establishing a stable (but not necessarily efficient) structure to human interaction (North, 1990). Meyer Nguyen (2005) suggested that institutions influence business strategies. Peng (2004: 110), noted that institutions affect firm strategies by con straining the range of acceptable actions. This paper will use the model introduced by Falkenberg (2007) on levels of institutions, where he noted the micro, macro and messo (contry) level institutions. Micro level institutions play as traffic rules for the human behaviour within the local culture. Messo level institutions interact at the national level of a country which include economic, political and legal systems. Macro institutions help to govern international business to be more profitable and fair for parties in the transaction. 2.6 Corporate Performance Mostly widely used form of performance measure for the firms is economic performance. Some studies use absolute measures while others use relative measures. When a relative measure is used, the performance of a firm is compared to others in the same industry. Dess Robinson (1984) used in each firms current performance relative to other firms in the industry. Fombrun Shanley (1990) used relative competitive measure in terms of sales growth, Return on equity, Return on investments etc. Objective performance measures has been highlited to be complex for small firms compared to large firms (Dess Robinson, 1984). Just as price signals a firms inherent quality to consumers, high economic performance signals a firms inherent quality to investors and creditors (Fombrun and Shanley, 1990). 3.0 CONSTRUCTED MODEL AND HYPOTHESIS 3.1 Model The model below summarizes the theory discussed from above section. The idea from the model is that the key ingredients towards corporate core strategic capabilities are corporate capabilities and corporate integrity, institutions are mediating this relation. On the other hand Core corporate strategic capabilities leads into sustainable corporate reputation. Corporate Capabilities Corporate Integrity Core Corporate strategic capabilities Sustainable Corporate Reputation Capital Institutions Macro Messo Micro + + + + + Corporate Performance + Figure 1 Source: (Author construct from literature, 2010) 3.2 Hypothesis and Prepositions 3.2.1The Effect on Corporate Core Strategic Capabilities Effects of Corporate Capabilities Corporate capability have been highlighted by Ulrich Wiersema (1989) to mean firms ability to establish internal structures and processes that create firm-specific competencies and enable it to adapt to changing external pressures. The rationale for arguing this is the fact that strategy by itself without organizational capabilities cannot deliver. This means the capability of strategy will heavily rely on the organizational capability. (Lenz, 1980) argued that broader a firms knowledge-technique base for value creation, the greater is its strategic capability. H1: Corporate capabilities have a positive impact on core corporate strategic capabilities. Effects of Corporate Integrity Velasquez (2006) pointed out that business activities, like any other human activities, cannot exist unless the people involved in the business and its surrounding community adhere to some minimal standards of ethics. Integrity facilitates the bottom line, making it of value to strategic values (Worden, 2003). A strategy based on integrity hold the organization to a more robust standard (Paine, 1994:111). Petrick Quinn (2001) suggested that integrity is an organizational strategic asset. The capability of strategy in this respect relies on the integrity of the organization employees and management which together formulate the dimension of corporate integrity. Formal way of arguing is that a strategy as a formulated means will not only need empowerment from the organization but will require the ethical dimension which ensure that there is a match between the underlined actions and expectations to the actual implementation. H2: Corporate Integrity has a positive impact on corp orate core strategic capabilities Effects of Institutions Institutions to which the corporate are operating have a key role in determining their strategic capability. The strategy may be capable in one country and became incapable in another country just because of the variation of institutional factors. Formally I argue that the institutions have positive mediating effect between the corporate integrity and core strategic capability as well as in relation between corporate capability and core strategic capability. Lewin et al (1999), noted that strategies and organizational responses are expected to be partly shaped by country-specific changes affecting business system and culture, and by history and firm-specific history-dependent exploitations and explorations H3a: Level of integration of Institutional aspects in the corporation has a positive mediating effect between corporate capabilities and core strategic capabilities. H3b: Level of Institutional integration aspect in the corporation has a positive mediating effect between corporate integrity and corporate strategic capabilities. 3.2.2 Effect on Sustainable Corporate reputation Effect of Core strategic capabilities Worden (2003) viewed corporate reputation as a base of an organizational identity, crystallizing the essence of what a company is, does, and stands for through images held of the organization in its environment. The description of worden represent ideal of what a strategic capability can ensure for the organization, meaning it will not only impact positively on reputation but will also ensure the sustainability of it. H4: Core strategic capabilities have a positive effect on Sustainable corporate reputation Effect of Institutions Institutions have also a key role in determining corporate reputation. Culture values which centres on establishing society norms for judging what is right or wrong provide a key influence on shaping a response with respect to how people views a certain conduct as a reputable or not. Also international laws, rules and principles as well as local government laws and media plays key roles in evaluating or judging the perception to what the corporations are doing. The reputation of a firm is not only an outcome of its performance but depends on whether the performance is in accordance to institutional expectations. Formally arguing the institutions have a direct effect on sustainable corporate reputation. H5: Level of integration of Institutional aspects in the corporation has a positive effect on sustainable corporate reputation. Effects of Performance Relationship between a firms reputation and its financial performance is complex (Hammond and Slocum, 1996). Key two reasons which were mentioned by the authors to be souce of complexity are; First, it takes profit to have the funds to have socially responsible activities. Second is the differences in stakeholders interests, whereby satisfying one group could be at the expense of the other. Thirdly is that corporate reputation often represents stakeholders perception of the quality of the firms management. The results from Hammond Slocum (1996) study indicated that performance (measured by return on sales) has a positive impact on firms later reputation. Citing specific examples, they found that ROE in 1981 was positively associated with good reputation in 1993. On the other hand an empirical analysis by Sabate and Puente (2003), indicated a two way relationship between reputation and performance. H7: There is positive interrelation between corporate performance and corporate r eputation 3.2.3 Effect on Performance Core strategic capabilities Hill and Snell (1988), found a directly positive effect of strategy on firm performance (in terms of profitability). On the other hand Beard Dess (1981), found that both corporate-level strategy and business level strategy are important in explaining variations in firm profitability. H8: Core strategic capabilities has a positive impact on corporate performance RESEARCH METHOD SAMPLE This study intends to use about 250 Multinational corporations. The sample is intended to be half splited between multinationals that operates in developing economies and those which operates in developed economies. In a situation which a particular multinationals is operating in both econmies (which is a likely to be a case), one on subsidiary will be choosen. 4.0 EMPIRICAL MEASUREMENTS 4.1 Reputation Fortune 1000, have examples of items they use in assessing firm reputation from managers and analyst and they include aspects like; asset use, community and environmental friendliness, ability to develop and keep key people, financial soundness, degree of innovativeness, investment value, management quality and product quality. Cravens et al (2003) developed a reputation index measure which reflected the following aspect; Product/service; employee/suppliers; external relationships/alliances; innovation; value creation; financial strength and viability; strategy; culture; intangible liabilities. These items do not differ from what Schwaiger (2004) noted same features as well. Fombrun and Shanley (1990) used 11-pont scale (0= poor, 10= excellent) and questions focused on how would respondent rate the companies on each of the following attributes: quality of management, quality of products or services; long-term investment value; innovativeness; financial soundness; ability t o attract, develop, and keep talented people; community and environmental responsibility; and use of corporate assets. This paper will adopt this measure. 4.2 Integrity Kaptein and Avelino (2005) will be used (7-points likert scale) where key items are; the existence of codes, the quality of compliance programs; the ways these codes and programs are embedded in and supported by the corporate structure and culture; the frequency of unethical conduct. Authors broadened up these dimensions into specific set of items which were ranked in percentages from (0= poor to 100%= excellent). These items are False/misleading promises to customers; violation of workplace health/safety rules, employment discrimination; sexual harassment or hostile work environment; carelessness with confidential/proprietary information; Activities posing a conflict of interest; 4.3 Organizational Capababilities: This paper will use part of items developed by Lenz (1980), Ulrich Lake (1991) which included managerial, technological, leadership, innovation, negotiation and communication capabilities. These all items will be used in 7-points likert scale and the focus will be finding out the extent to which particular organization posess them. Sharma Vredenburg (1998) provided detailed items, and they will also be used in addition to above. 4.4 Core strategic Capabilites Most strategic literature argue that a core strategy must be rare, inimitable, valuable as well as organizable. These character are not necessarily the capabilities themselves rather they are centred at creating a competitive advantage i.e. an advantage of a firm relative to their competitors in a given industry. Sharma Vredenburg (1998). Example of some statements could be; We have capable means to address conflicts within and outside the organization; Our strategies (means) are unique and well embedded in our organization (not easy to copy by other organizations) and are capable at creating benefits; Our strategies are capable of addressing local challenges as well as meeting universal standards; Our strategies do not conflict with local culture and society values; Our strategies are capable of ensuring sustainable growth 4.5 Institutions In measuring the institutions there will be a need to deal with the three dimensions of institutions Falkenberg (2007 i.e. macro, messo and micro. 7-points likert scale will be used for a set of measuring items which organization will agree or disagree on the extent to which they integrate these institutional items in their strategies and as well on the level they feel they influence their organization. The Lewin et al (1999), five institutional components; Role of government (extensiveness of involvement, regulatory environment in terms of detailness, guidance or laissez-faire), Rule of law (level of developed rules, government role in terms of centralization or decentralization , and transparency), Structure of capital markets (level of restrictiveness versus competitiveness, banks long term equity owners versus sophisticated, large scale liquid markets), Education system (centralized versus decentralized, uniform versus heterogenous, vocational versus non vocationa, meritocracy versus path for socioeconomic system) 4.6 Corporate performance Dess Robinson (1984) used both subjective and self-reported objective measures of return on assets and growth in sales as well as two measures of what may be considered overall or global organizational performance. Objective measures included firm total sales growth, firm after tax return on total assets, and overall firm performance. These measures were then ranked into a five point scale. The subjective performance involved asking CEOs to comment on ideal or optimal performance of their firms in their industries with comparison to competitors. Buck et al (1998) used mainly economic criterias for performance, and key iterms they used were market share, growth (sales), profitability, Retur non investment (ROIC), and ration of market to book value. The decision to include subjective measures in performance relies moslty on the study objectives, whether it is a comparison of measures or it is something involving analysis of relations among variables. This study will adopt mainly eco nomic performance measures used by Buck et al (1998), but in addition the measures will be ranked into a 7-points likert scale. 5.0 Data Analysis Technique Based on the nature of this study qualitative and quantitative data analysis methods will be appropriate. With regard to quantitative data analysis method the following linear regressive (additive) model will be used to test hypothesis H1 to H8. STRCAP = ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ² o + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ² 1CORPCAP + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ²2CORPINT + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ²3INST + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ µ ( i) Where, STRCAP= Strategic Capabilities CORPCAP= Corporate Capabilities CORPINT= Corporate Integrity INST= Institutions STRCAP= ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ² o + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ² 1CORPCAP + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ²2CORPINT + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ²3INST + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ²4CORPCAPXINST + (ii) ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢5CORPINTXINST + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ µ Where, CORPXINST= Interaction of corporate capabilities and institutions COPRINTXINST = Interaction of corporate integrity and institutions. CORPREP= ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ² o + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ² 1STRATCAP + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ²2INST + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ²3CORPP ERF + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ µ (iii) Where, CORPREP= Corporate Reputation CORPPERF= Corporate Performance CORPERF = ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ² o + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ² 1STRATCAP + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ ²2CORPREP + ÃÆ'Ã… ½Ãƒâ€šÃ‚ µ

Human Activity Is Responsible For Global Climate Change

Human Activity is Primarily Responsible for Global Climate change Global Warming is a long term increase in earth’s average surface temperature. Because global warming does not cause uniform warming in all locations and because many other changes in climate are occurring, scientists often prefer to speak of ‘’Global Climate Change’’ rather than of global warming when referring to the whole complex of climate changes caused by Human activities. Global climate changes, including episodes of global cooling and warming, have occurred many times throughout earth’s history as a result of natural variations in solar radiation, volcanic eruptions and other factors. The atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases have increased because of human activities, primarily due to the combustion of fossil fuels, deforestation and agricultural practices. ‘’The weight of scientific evidence suggests that the observed changes in the earth’s climate are, at least in, due to human activities’’ (Kerr). Is primarily caused by human activities that started during the Industrial Revolution, when human burning of fossil fuels began to increase drastically, releasing large amount of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and artificial chemicals called halocarbons have long been increasing as a result of emission from fossil fuel burning and other activities. Increased atmospheric concentrations of these gases are causing earth to warm. A more troublesome way that human increase carbon dioxide levelShow MoreRelatedIs Human Activity Primarily Responsible For Global Climate Change And Global Warming?1371 Words   |  6 PagesIs Human Activity Primarily Responsible for Global Climate Change and Global Warming? What is global climate change? Is human activity primarily responsible? According to the United States Environmental Protection Agency, global warming â€Å"refers to the recent and ongoing rise in global average temperature near Earth s surface. It is caused mostly by increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Global warming is causing climate patterns to change. However, global warming itselfRead MoreThe Debate On Global Climate Change1605 Words   |  7 PagesThe debate on global climate change argues that human-generated greenhouse gas emissions are too small to substantially change the earth’s climate and that the planet is capable of absorbing those increases. It is contended that warming over the 20th century resulted primarily from natural processes such as fluctuations in the sun s heat and ocean currents. But the theory of human-caused global climate change is based on questionable measurements, faulty climate models, and misleading science. I nRead MoreReview of The Great Global Warming Swindle1281 Words   |  6 Pages The Great Global Warming Swindle has been the most widely watched documentary critical of the scientific consensus that climate change is due to anthropogenic activities. Aired in 2007 in the United Kingdom, the documentary claimed to debunk the â€Å"myth† of manmade global climate change, exposing it as a vast conspiracy designed to gain funding for research and push an environmental agenda that is especially harmful to the developing world. Directed by British producer Martin Durkin, the documentaryRead MoreClimate Change : Global Warming1715 Words   |  7 PagesConference, President Obama said, â€Å"climate change is no longer some far off problem; it is happening here; it is happening now†. President Barack Obama states a good fact; climate change is affecting the world tremendously. The glaciers are melting at an astonishing rate and the surface temperature of the world is only increasing. Currently, scientists argue that climate change intensified because of human activity; however, the circumstance is quite the opposite. Global warming refers to the rising surfaceRead MoreThe Debate On Global Warming1239 Words   |  5 Pagescontroversy concerning global warming. The controversy takes the form of public debate that centers on five issues (Mazo 30). The first issue is whether or not global warming is occurring. The second issue is whether global warming is real and extent it has occurred in the recent decades. The third question relates to the causes of global warming. The fourth question centers on the effects of global warming. The fifth question is whether any action needs to be taken to contain global warming. The authorRead MoreThe Effects Of Global Warming On Earth1577 Words   |  7 Pagesto be. It is known as global warming. Global warming is constant rise in the global average temperature near the surface of the earth. Although to some, global warming is nothing more than a myth, a rumor to scare the race into rethinking their selfish acts, but global warming is no myth. I believe that global warming is far from a myth, it is real and it is dangerous. The evidence is all around us. If you look to the stars, you can see that the atmosphere is full of human-produced molecules thatRead MoreGlobal Warming Is A Significant Problem Over The Past Years1231 Words   |  5 PagesGlobal warming has become a significant problem over the past years. Global warming is the result of an increase in the Earth’s temperature due to the presence of greenhouse gasses like carbon dioxide and methane in our atmosphere. Though these gasses are required for the presence of human life one Earth excess amount in our atmosphere can lead to climate change. Some argue that human activity is primarily responsible for global warming. Others argue that global warming is a natural occurrence andRead MoreGlobal Warming And Its Effect On The Envir onment1311 Words   |  6 PagesIntroduction Global warming refers to an incremental in earth’s temperature. Some believes this is occurring naturally but the prevailing view attributes climate change to the greenhouse effect. The greenhouse effect refers to the warming resulting from certain gases such as carbon dioxide in Earth s atmosphere trapping heat. These gases traps heat but let light in, similarly to the glass walls of a greenhouse. The general belief is that mankind are chiefly responsible for global warming becauseRead MoreThe Debate Over Global Warming1063 Words   |  5 PagesThe climate change debate has been ongoing for nearly thirty years now, the debate is over the causation(s) of global warming. Temperatures on earth have increased approximately 2.0 °F since the early 20th century. Levels of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane have drastically increased within the atmosphere. Both sides within the debate surrounding global climate change can agree on these points. However; disagree on a number of other possible causations of global warming. Even thoughRead MoreThe Effects Of Fossil Fuels On The Environment1734 Words   |  7 Pagesno return, warns President Obama, â€Å"we are condemning future generations to global catastrophe.† The point of no return metaphorically represents the place in ones journey that must be continued with no alternative routes or ability to make chang e. In consort with President Obama, many scientists believe the point of no return could occur if significant efforts aren’t made soon. Anthropogenic (human influenced) activities in comparison to natural influences have more of an impact on the environment

Comparing and Contrasting Between Two Companies - Bramble and Blackmore

Question: Discuss about theComparing and Contrasting Between Two Companies,Bramble and Blackmore. Answer: Introduction Bramble is a logistic company, who lead their business through a supply-chain process. They operate their business in around 60 countries by the help of CHEP, IFCO brands. The company shows their expertise in loading the equipment such as oil, gas and aerospace sector. Blackmore is a leading company in Australia who produce natural health product (Borowiak et al., 2012). The Blackmore Company basically manufactures a huge range of minerals, herbal supplements, nutritional supplements and vitamins by the help of which they can able to make way in the medicine sector. They manufacture medicines for human beings and animals both. Both of the two companies are highly skilled and equipped for providing best quality service to their customers through all over the world. A Vision and Mission Statement The vision of Bramble Company is to become number one leading company throughout the world who can able to provide innovative solutions within the business model, whereas the Blackmore company's vision is to provide natural healthy products and required services to their customers to meet the level of high standards which is set by the company (Blackmores.com.au, 2016). The Bramble Company always use skilled knowledge for setting their values within the mindsets of their customers, whereas the vision of Blackmore Company is to innovate several factors within the medicine sector which also provides high degree knowledge to their customers about medicine. The Bramble Company always have a tendency to have a great stakeholder value by integrating the ability of work and growth, whereas the Blackmore Company has a tendency to become a number one employer by giving support to the social pattern in different ways (Brambles Corporate Site, 2016). The Bramble Company always try to deliver an innovative sense of culture, whereas the Blackmore Company always wants to educate the people by giving them an award-winning service by the help of their websites. Both of the companies give their first priority to the people, environment, and society. According to the corporate businesses, the above points are measurable, realistic and achievable regarding the parameters of time. Both the companies are engaging their entire attention on their stakeholders by the help of their management process. The Bramble Company has more than 10000 employees and all of them has the aim to achieve a big platform that they can able to provide a good quality service to their customer whereas the Blackmore Company has a great interest to do work with the employees from other countries. The Blackmore Companies has nearly 300 numbers of employees only from Asia. From these points, it can be said that the vision and mission of both of these two companies have the aim to provide a good quality service to their customers and also to make the world better place (O'Donovan, 2014). Both of the two companies are consists of skilled employees by the help of which the companies can easily set the goals and also able to achieve the goals. By the help of this innovative mission and vision both of the companies are able to incorporate several numbers of new customers and stakeholders within their business. Values of the Organization The Values of the Bramble Company are mentioned in their code of conduct which also reflects the culture and group of their employees, whereas the Values of Blackmore Company are incorporated within each and every segment of their company which is a behavioral objective of the company. According to the values of Bramble Company, every member of this company should show respect and do extremely well to the others in any working environment or circumstances whereas the Blackmore Company believes that they should provide an authentic approach regarding the health issues which actually inspire them to do extremely well into their work (Waldman, 2011). The Bramble Company believes in teamwork, loyalty, safety and diversity in the process of their business, whereas the Blackmore Company believes in authenticity, trustworthy, business and personal behavior and high standard professionals. The values of the Bramble Company are to show respect to every community within the environment while t hey operate their business, whereas the Blackmore Company has a value to treat everybody with respect and always show fair attitude to everybody in every circumstance. The values of Bramble Company have the intention to use knowledge, wisdom, and experience to influence and inspire the every people within the environment but they are more centric towards the customer accumulation whereas the values of the Blackmore Company is almost same (Ryall, 2010). The activity of the Bramble Company is very acute according to the laws, rules, and regulations and also adopts several fair practices to minimize the waste and emission within the environment whereas the activity of the Blackmore Company is very acute according to the social responsibility because of respect. Kindness is most important concern about the people, environment, and community within the society. Corporate Social Responsibility/ Sustainability Each and every organization has some corporate social responsibilities towards the environment, community, governance, employee, etc. Brambles have more than 10000 employees through over 45 number of countries and the Blackmore have more than 1000 employees among them around 300 employees are from Asia (Weiss, 2014). The research shows that both of these two companies have the good position than the other companies in respect to the four key aspects such as employee, environment, community and governance. The community segment is consists of local, national and international communities. In this section, the Blackmore Company is scored better than the Brambles. The environment segment consists of positive interactions and actions along with the utilization of the natural resource and also has a great impact of that actions and interactions on the ecosystem of the planet. According to the research, Brambles have the good rating which measurably more than the rating of Blackmore Compan y (Zhong, 2013). The employee is the 3rd segment where the comparison between the two companies is taking place. By the help of this section, everybody can able to know the policies of the company about their employees, evaluation of the employee performance, labor rights, compensations, industrial training, etc. These factors help the organizations to gain benefit for the organization. According to the comparison of the policies, the Bramble Company can able to achieve more desired outcomes than the Blackmore Company. The final segment is Governance. In this segment, the corporate governance is consists of managerial skills, stakeholders concern, policy disclosure, executive compensation etc. By the help of corporate governance, the company can able to maintain the sustainability within their performance (Oakey, 2010). According to the research, it can be said that both of the two companies have almost similar ethics and effective outcome regarding the aspects of the corporate gove rnance. Stakeholders Mentioned in their Corporate Statements Stakeholders are one of the most important assets of an organization. They help in growth and development of the organization throughout the whole process. The attention which is provided by the Bramble Company to their customers is essential to maintain the relationship, the large scale of network and the capital which is invested in helping the company for competing with other companies who are also engage within the similar product marketing (Chapman, 2011). The attention which is provided by the Blackmore Company to their customers is a very innovative and creative idea in the manufacturing process of the product, the capital which is the gain after investment, and the availability of the discount product absolutely for the stakeholders. By considering the stakeholder within the organization, the Bramble Company has the ability to gain a continuous benefit by achieving a considerable profit in their sales revenue and capital gain. The Blackmore Company also has a good plan about sorting out the dividends to their stakeholders (Fabozzi and Markowitz, 2011). The companies completely transfer the dividends and interests directly to the accounts of the customers. According to the DRP plans, the stakeholders of the Blackmore Company does not require to pay for the brokerages, commissions and stamp duty for purchasing the respective shares of the company. Both of the two companies have a tendency to engage more numbers of stakeholders into their organizations by the help of various innovative plans (Newcome et al., 2015). The Blackmore Company has an innovative plan by the help of which they can able to provide awareness about their respective concerns and the Bramble Company make a plan by the help of which the company can able to run the business of logistic supply chain smoothly for their customers and stakeholders. Brand communities are very important for maintaining and increasing the number of customers and stakeholders. Conclusion In this research study, it can be easily said that both of the two companies has a tendency to achieve market credibility by giving good quality products and services to their customers through all over the world. By discussing the environmental issues it is also clear that both of the two companies has a great knowledge about the waste management process. Stakeholders are the most important asset for both of the two companies. Both of the two companies have a common aim that they want to educate their customers with the help of online courses. Reference Blackmores.com.au. (2016).About us. [online] Available at: https://www.blackmores.com.au/about-us [Accessed 29 Nov. 2016]. Brambles Corporate Site. (2016).About Brambles. [online] Available at: https://www.brambles.com/about-brambles#section-span-classlevel-1span1span-overview-of-operations-span-4236 [Accessed 29 Nov. 2016]. Borowiak, A., Galmarini, S., Hjorth, J., Thunis, P., Van Dingenen, R. and Dentener, F. (2012).Support to the review of the thematic strategy on air pollution. Luxembourg: Publications Office. Chapman, R. (2011).Simple tools and techniques for enterprise risk management. Chichester, England: Wiley. Fabozzi, F., and Markowitz, H. (2011). The theory and practice of investment management. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley Sons. Newcomer, K., Wholey, J., and Hatry, H. (2015). Handbook of practical program evaluation, 4th ed. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass. Oakey, R. (2010).New technology-based firms in the new millennium. Bingley, U.K.: Emerald. O'Donovan, G. (2014).Solvency II. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Ltd. Ryall, M. (2010).Bridge management. Amsterdam: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann. Waldman, S. (2011).Pain management. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders. Weiss, J. (2014).Business ethics. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. Zhong, S. (2013).Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Cybernetics and Informatics. New York, NY: Springer.